Search for MH 370: Is it a massive cover-up?


The disappearance of the Malaysia Airlines Flight MH 370 which left Kuala Lumpur International Airport for Beijing Capital international airport on March 8, 2014, has left me puzzled and disillusioned.

Although I don’t want to believe lot of bizarre theories doing rounds, I feel overpowered with a feeling that what followed the disappearance is not exactly a genuine investigation.

It is more of a massive cover-up operation.

I am saying this because the handling of this unfortunate mishap has been murky right from the beginning.

MH 370 left Malaysia at 00:41. The Last Malaysian ATC voice contact happened at 1:19. The pilot said: “All right, good night”. At 1:22 the transponders of the plane went off. At 1:30, the pilot of another plane contacted MH 370 on the request of the Vietnamese ATC. The contact was established but the pilot could only hear mumbling and static. This was the last live contact reported. The last automated hourly ACARS (Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System) handshake with Inmarsat satellite reportedly took place at 8:10

The flight was scheduled to arrive at Beijing at 6:30 am. But the Malaysia Airlines announced at 7:41 that the flight MH 370 was missing and that the search and rescue operations were initiated.

According to some reports and technical data provided by engine manufacturer Rolls Royce based on its ACARS data from the flight, MH 370 was aloft about 4 to 5 hours after the transponders went off. But these reports were challenged by Malaysia.

Then there were reports about two of the passengers flying on stolen passports and insinuations that it the disappearance could be an act of terrorism. But again there were counter reports claiming the two men were more likely to be asylum seekers than terrorists.

What I feel is that when there is an investigation at such a high level with so many parties – governments, defence establishments, aviation experts – the clues and the data must converge. If this does not happen it clearly means that one or more of the parties are either hiding data or providing false data.

But why would that happen?

The most plausible and logical reason is that “something” powerful doesn’t want the truth to be out as it would severely damage “its” interests.

If the safety of the passengers and the crew were paramount (which should be the case ideally), the alert should have been sounded at around 1:22 when the transponders went off. Instead the world ostensibly came to know about it at 7: 41 i.e. more than six hours after the transponders went off.

From the very beginning any theory pointing to the technical, mechanical or communication glitch has been quickly rebuffed. Everything was “absolutely perfect” about the aircraft and the aviation technology. Instead the theories of “situation beyond the human control” have been aggressively pushed.

Is this what we have achieved with globalization, and telecommunication revolution?

No. I firmly believe that technology today is powerful enough to have possibly averted the mishap in the first place and also to have searched the plane after the disaster struck.

Unless, the technology was not intended to be used that way.

Why? It may be because some people have decided that it is in the best of the interests of this world to never know about it.

I might be sounding skeptical but for me things in this case don’t add up. And I hope to be proved wrong on my skepticism

The world owes to the crew and the passengers of that ill fated flight.

Thanks for your time. Hope to receive something edifying in the comments.

12 responses to “Search for MH 370: Is it a massive cover-up?”

  1. You make an interesting point. Of course, with all kinds of theories popping up, yours may also be likely. It’s been over two weeks now and what you said about technology is true. Why spend so much on technology when it won’t help you find a single missing airplane? And it’s not as if governments never hide anything. It’s also very distressing to see what the victims’ families are going through at the moment and I pray that whatever happens, may it be in the best interest of everyone.

  2. Good read sir , I felt really relaxed after I read this …….. I loved the mystery described , the facts shared and it was really an eye opener 🙂

    1. Thank you so much. 🙂

  3. Reblogged this on THE KNOWLEDGE DOME and commented:

    The disappearance of the Malaysia Airlines Flight MH 370 which left Kuala Lumpur International Airport for Beijing Capital international airport on March 8, 2014, has left me puzzled and disillusioned.

    Although I don’t want to believe lot of bizarre theories doing rounds, I feel overpowered with a feeling that what followed the disappearance is not exactly a genuine investigation.

  4. If what you are proposing is true, wouldn’t it be easy for that powerful “something” to just support any theory and stage an investigation to support that theory and be out with the result that would satisfy the world. (Just being curious)

    1. That’s what they are trying to do. 🙂 The only problem is that any theory can be supported only with the help of the remains of the plane. China’s relative silence in the entire episode is also disturbing.

  5. Is there any reason a qualified reporter has not found and questioned the Boeing
    Flight trainer who trained the pilot of the MH370 how to fly a large new 777,
    and ask him if he has any insight into what overcame the pilot and/or coerced
    him to do something against his will? Not due to terrorists in the
    cockpit, but due to western contractors and intel operatives that had something
    on him? This would be more helpful than all the senseless sky and sea
    searches and wild theories of which not a single one of them seem to point in
    the correct direction?

    Erich Shih, chief reporter at Chinese-language military news monthly Defense International, said the US has more and better satellites but has not
    taken part in the search for flight MH370, which disappeared about an hour into its flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing in the early hours of March 8 with 239 people on board. Shih claimed that the US held back because it wanted to see what
    information China’s satellites would provide. What is Inmarsat of UK,
    a British satellite communications defense contractor with deep ties to
    Raytheon and the Pentagon [and with Boeing the producer of the 777 which
    screwed up mysteriously], withholding from the press of the free world?

    December, 2013, the USAtlas V rocket was launched carrying the spy satellite NROL-39 for the National Reconnaissance Office [NRO], an intelligence agency which is often overshadowed by the National Security Agency (NSA), only it scoops data via spy satellites in outer space.
    The “NROL-39 emblem” is represented by an Octopus a versatile, adaptive, and
    highly intelligent creature. The emblem boldly states “Nothing is beyond our reach”. This virtually means that the tentacles of America’s World Octopus are spreading across the globe to coil around everything within their grasp.

    Inmarsat of UK has long co-manufactured satellites with Boeing. We should all ask
    why Inmarsat had so much say in downpowering the search for survivors.
    The whole western media genuflected to the royal decree of Inmarsat.

    1. Thanks for the read and this insightful comment. You have a point there. I don’t know why but I get a feeling it is case of collateral damage.

  6. I have investigated most of significant airliner event since 1980. I am a private pilot with strong engeeniring background with good to excellent statistical knowledge. Sorry for grammatical error, i am french speaking.
    Now the subject : Statistical probability in this particular event points directly toward an overwhelming physical phenomena evidence.
    I am referring to quantum physic.
    MH 370 being the latest…Experienced captain and enthousiast copilot…suddenly went crazy…?
    The same with AF 447…three experienced aviator are in a stall condition they panic…really ?
    The same which cause B 777 to crash land in London….freezed fuel on both engine…really ?
    The same with B 777 wich crashed landed in San Francisco…auto-throttle…bad training…really ?
    The same with computer / airspeed bug that is relativly frequent with : Twin high bypass ailiners of the last generation…freezing of heated pitot tubes…at + 10 C …in dry atmospheric …condition…AF 447 really ?
    Ok Experts will jump on their feet, i know !
    Now look at it with very special eyes :
    The front turbines (the ones visible, in front of their engine) is turning at around 14000 RPM at full
    throttle, and somewhere between 3000 at idle and 10000 at cruise speed. Those mass turning are
    giant gyroscope. They rigidify space/time at 90 degrees from rotationnal axis. Fine up to now.
    We have two of them on the 777 and the 333.
    No problem with no turbulence, no problem with moderate to strong turbulence.
    But things begins to go badly out of control with light tubulence corresponding to a very specific oscillation pattern of pylones (strutures wich support the engines).
    What happens is the following :
    Space time is not only regidified but becomes unstable and at the fuselage water line (horizontal reference) just a few feet below the cockpit area : Where is the avionic bay !
    This unstable space time is wide enough to even affect cockpit area.
    The human brain is also affected by it in some circonstances being of electric / neuronal nature.
    ” The AF 447 captain, standing behind both pilots asked them :”are we going up or down ?”
    Final judiciary report used the term ” polarised neuronnes” to decribe pilots fatigue in this case.
    Combination of avionic and human, space time effect, caused by front fans critical harmonics oscillations, inducing space-time instability at 90 degrees of rotationnal axis.
    I personnally warned Airbus and Boeing a few months after the AF 447 crash via a commentary which i posted on a French news paper. The following days Airbus stated that any commentary posted on Internet regarding AF 447 could be used against the author.

    This comment is an opinion, it should not, in any case, involve Boeing or Airbus in any lawsuit against me, it is my opinion that both manufacturer did their best in designing their airplanes, which are products of an incredibily high quality.

    1. Dear Paul,
      Even without any exposure to quantum physics I can make sense of your lucid theoretical explanation and am willing to accept that abrupt anomalies in space-time can lead to unexplainable behavior of the pilots. But I am also deeply suspicious about a well directed human plot that made allowance for a massive collateral damage.

      1. I indeed agree, probability are much higher, taking fact into account, historical fact and tehnical fact, this lead strongly to the human plot theory.

Your comments are welcome!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: